Was visiting a buddy of mine at Autodesk and checked out the Tesla S they have in their gallery. Looks pretty sweet ... now just have to convince the wife to part with $5K for the deposit...
Now just gotta find people to charge!
Windows Phone 7 or WinPho7 (sounds like a tech noodle restaurant) launched today. A definite step up from Windows Mobile but still not enough to make people jump from Android or iPhone. Microsoft is definitely looking for the portion of the population that hasn't made the move to a smartphone yet but unfortunately for them, so is Google and Apple.
What gives me pause about this phone is not the interface. I haven't played with one yet but it looks intuitive and has some innovative features. My issue is the hardware which interestingly enough comes from the same manufacturers of Android phones. Samsung, LG, HTC, etc. just don't make amazing phones. They all make good phones but nothing earth shattering which is what it'll take to overtake the likes of Apple. Every Android phone I've held feels cheap, big, clunky, etc. It'll probably be the same with the new WinPho7 models. The bad part is that because the operating systems need to support multiple models, there will be compromises made to the least common denominator. A recipe for making a mediocre product.
Microsoft and Google have more than enough resources to throw at great industrial design. If this is truly a key market for them then they need to develop their own phone. The money is not in software alone. Google gives away the operating system and makes money on app sales and ads. Microsoft will most likely charge a nominal licensing fee for a WinPho7 license. Apple makes nearly 60% in gross margins on the iPhone because of hardware and software. That's about $300+ per iPhone but it's not all about the money - it's about building a phone that will blow away the competition.
If you're a tech-head, entrepreneur, investor, etc. (or just interested in these things), Quora has got to be the number one site on your bookmarks. Where else can you ask a question about a start-up and have the CEO of said start-up answer it? Instances like the one below are the norm and not the exception on this site.
What's amazing to me is how many Q/A sites existed before Quora yet never were able to get this depth of users. Every time I go to another site, I have little confidence in the answers given. Granted, Quora isn't as strong outside of the topics I mentioned earlier but I get the impression they'll be catching up soon. One reason may be the fact that there's mostly no anonymity by the answerers. This goes a long way in terms of weighing the value of each answer. If someone else gave me the answer below instead of Kevin Systrom, I'd probably dismiss it.